cvtoken.vip

Ant teams beat gravity-based puzzle solvers

Groups of ants carrying loads through narrow openings. Credit: Tabea Dreyer. Ants live in highly organized colonies and cooperate daily to tackle a wide range of problems. Their strikin...

Ant teams beat gravity-based puzzle solvers
Groups of ants carrying loads through narrow openings. Credit: Tabea Dreyer.

Ants live in highly organized colonies and cooperate daily to tackle a wide range of problems. Their striking group behaviors have fascinated biologists for centuries and even inspired the development of various artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Researchers at Weizmann Institute of Science recently carried out a study aimed at further exploring how ant teams tackle problems of varying complexity. Their findings, published in Journal of the Royal Society Interface, suggest that larger ant groups can solve more complex problems or puzzles than smaller teams.

"The inspiration for this paper came from observing ants cooperatively transporting large food loads to their nest in the field," Ofer Feinerman, senior author of the paper, told Phys.org. "When the ants reach their nest, they inevitably face a challenge—they need to maneuver the large, often irregularly shaped load through the narrow entrance. This natural geometric puzzle inspired us to try to map out the ants' puzzle-solving capabilities and see how these may scale with the size of the group."

Ant teams beat gravity-based puzzle solvers
Groups of ants carrying loads through narrow openings. Credit: Tabea Dreyer.

Probing ant cooperation with experiments and simulations

Feinerman and his colleagues wanted to determine whether the size of an ant team influences the complexity of problems that can be tackled collectively. To do this, they performed a series of field experiments involving longhorn crazy ants (Paratrechina longicornis).

The researchers first created tiny objects using 3D printing technology, precisely engineering their weight and characteristics. They then incubated the 3D-printed loads in cat food overnight, making them attractive to ants. Essentially, they tricked the ants into collecting the tiny objects and carrying them through a maze toward their nest.

"All we had to do was put the load and a laser-cut maze near the ant nest—the ants would do the rest as we filmed from above," Feinerman explained. "To test different group sizes, we created scaled versions of each maze. We made sure the weight of the load, normalized by the number of ants, stayed constant across the different scales so that we were measuring coordination and cooperation and not simply making the task physically more demanding. Since this is a purely geometric puzzle, scaling it made no difference in the computational difficulty of solving it."

Credit: Journal of the Royal Society Interface (2026). DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2025.0989

The researchers found that larger ant groups were typically able to tackle more complex puzzles than smaller groups. However, differences between small and large groups only became apparent when problems became sufficiently complex.

In other words, almost all ant groups performed well on straightforward tasks that required them to carry small loads through a simple maze. When mazes were more intricate and loads heavier, however, larger groups became far more efficient than smaller ones.

As part of their study, Feinerman and his colleagues also ran a computer simulation in which agents tried to solve the same puzzles tackled by the ants, relying on physical forces or theories. These simulations offered possible explanations for why complex problems were solved more efficiently by larger ant groups.

"The simulations showed that simple puzzles can be solved by simple gravity-based models: If one were to take the maze, with the load inside, tilt it and shake the whole thing, the load would eventually fall out," Feinerman said.

"However, as the puzzles grew more difficult, we had to supplement the physics simulation with more 'ant-like' properties that have to do with the ants' distributed nature. These can include gravity not acting on the center of mass, gravity acting on a different point on the object and switching every several seconds, or gravity knowing where the next opening in the maze is and acting in that direction."

Next steps for exploring ant problem-solving

Interestingly, when the team supplemented their physics-based models with ant-inspired properties and strategies, they found that simulated agents could solve the puzzles more effectively. These findings further highlight the collective intelligence and adaptability of ant colonies.

"Would one call the models we developed cognitive, though? Probably not. They are just random and unknowing," Feinerman said. "It is important to note that puzzles still do not match the ants; they match the ants only if we tune puzzle parameters differently for each maze. The ants do not require such tuning and appear to use the same rules to solve all mazes without any outside information."

In the future, the new insights gathered by Feinerman and his colleagues could potentially inspire the development of new AI systems and swarm robotics frameworks. Meanwhile, the researchers plan to continue investigating the complex group behaviors of ants to learn more about their behavioral and neural underpinnings.

"We are now trying to understand how ants fine-tune their behavior to be able to generalize and solve a huge variety of puzzles," Feinerman added. "Specifically, we want to look at whether this impressive property comes from the brain of individual ants or from properties of the collective that we have yet to understand."

Written for you by our author Ingrid Fadelli, edited by Gaby Clark, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You'll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.

Publication details

Tabea Dreyer et al, Collective ant transport outperforms gravity-based solvers on complex puzzles, Journal of the Royal Society Interface (2026). DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2025.0989.

Who's behind this story?

Ingrid Fadelli

Ingrid Fadelli

Freelance journalist with BSc Psychology and MA International Journalism. Covers AI, robotics, neuroscience, and astrophysics since 2018. Full profile →

Gaby Clark

Gaby Clark

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile →

Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →

© 2026 Science X Network

Citation: Ant teams beat gravity-based puzzle solvers (2026, August 3) retrieved 3 August 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-08-ant-teams-gravity-based-puzzle.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.